On a grey lunchtime last week I made my way to Vaughan College, Leicester University’s Institute of Lifelong Learning, for the East Midlands Economic Network Community Bridge Building Conference (EMEN), supported by Leicester Comedy Festival. Lunch was provided and gave a good opportunity to network with others who had come from the local area and from around the country. There were representatives from various organisations including Voluntary Action Leicester, Charnwood Arts, Soft Touch, Leicester City Council, Youth Voice, De Montfort University, and the Institute of Community Cohesion.
The afternoon conference was introduced and chaired by Bernard Greaves (EMEN) who spoke about the good cross-cultural relationships at leadership level in the city, but stated that, sadly in Leicester, whilst people are tolerant, relationships between different groups only go skin-deep. I would suggest there are some notable exceptions, particularly between some different faith groups, and in schools where children simply do not register the difference between white, brown, black, headscarf, crucifix, skullcap etc. This was certainly my experience whilst working at Sir Jonathan North Community College in October and November of 2007.
There were three case studies of different ways of encouraging community cohesion:
- Jay Poppat, a sports practitioner, spoke of the importance of sport in bringing together different communities.
- Paul Barrand, a painter and community artist, spoke of his experience working with young people in Coalville
- John Ryan, a comedian, spoke about the use of comedy in bringing people together through sharing experiences and looking at the commonalities
Hamza Vayani, the Chief Executive of Youth Voice, spoke about the importance of strategy and structure and the tension between developing national common values whilst not losing individual and community identity. He stressed the importance of visible social justice.Thilo Boeck from the Centre for Social Action At De Montfort University gave a short talk on community cohesion from an academic viewpoint, asking some interesting questions about wider social issues and their implications for community cohesion. For example, he spoke about the concept of home and belonging and whilst many people can choose home, others do not have the financial capacity to move house, nor the social capacity to change their neighbourhood.
Daljit Kaur from the Institute of Community Cohesion was for me the highlight of the conference. I spoke to her when I arrived at the conference and discovered she was inolved in the development of the Taking Forward Community Cohesion in Leicester report which highlighted the importance young people’s and women’s participation in civic activity and decision making. She spoke of the lack of values in leadership, she spoke about the importance of transforming gatekeepers, key information-holders in the community, into gateways, and she spoke of vision and leadership needing to come from the grassroots.
Having attended this conference, I feel confidently happy that ICLS fits squarely into the national community cohesion agenda of moderation and integration. However, I feel strongly that the motivation for community cohesioin agenda should be driven by a desire to see a broader equality of race, gender, ability, belief, age and sexuality, and ultimately to serve the purposes of those working for social justice.
