Due to a small number of people applying for the course, we changed the format by shortening its duration from 4½ days to 2 days. And we certainly packed a lot into the time. We were able to provide relevant and high-quality training from the staff of St Philip’s Centre and from the ICLS steering group. The training covered Diversity, Faith and Identity, Leadership and Teamwork, Conflict Resolution, Project Management, and Communication and Media.
We were expecting to take four students from Leicester College away, but in the event, one student was unwell and so we were down to three. However, due to the number of contributors, including members of the steering group, we were able to create a good atmosphere of enquiry and learning, and due to the small numbers we were able to tailor the course to the participants’ requirements, referring to different aspects of their lives and current leadership roles.
The evaluations we facilitated throughout the two days revealed many positives, some negatives, and some interesting ways to improve.
A major positive was the course content, and the fact that the participants were doing things and covering material which they had never done before. For example, each participant had the opportunity to present to the rest of the group, which greatly increased their confidence. Another aspect which received positive comments was the so-called ‘shield’ activities, where each participant reflects on part of their own life. The way the course was constantly grounded in the lives of the participants was one of its strengths.
Some of the negatives included not enough handouts, more variety of learning styles required, not enough ‘doing’ activities, especially in the afternoon session, and not enough free time to enjoy the beautiful countryside.
There are always many ways to improve, and I think we currently have the flexibility of approach which enables us to respond well to our participants. The key suggestions during the evaluation included adopting a more diverse approach to learning styles, providing more/better handouts from contributors, and ensuring that each session is broken up with different types of activity.
The feedback in the final evaluation session was very good. Each participant said they had learned something new that they could apply to their lives currently, and that they would like to look into using more in the future.
